So which one do you follow?
One competitor of yours is moving upmarket. Fewer deals, higher value, longer cycles to close. They’re going after larger customers, involving more stakeholders, and building a process that can support that.
Another is going downmarket. More volume, faster cycles, lower price points. Simpler product, quicker decisions, more throughput.
Your company sits in between.
Working with a range of deal sizes.
Closing some deals quickly, others over longer cycles.
Seeing variation, rather than a single pattern.
👉 Are we doing this wrong?
Is 36.6 degrees Celsius better than 60 miles per hour?
A comparison only works when the situations actually match.
Otherwise, you’re comparing readings of a thermometer to readings of a speedometer.
Both are accurate.
Both are numbers.
But they tell you completely different things.
If you dig a bit deeper into what’s driving those directions:
Company A (moving upmarket):
Company B (going downmarket):
Both directions make sense in their context.
Is one better than the other?
You can say 60 is bigger than 36.6 and you’d be correct.
But you’re still comparing numbers — just not measuring the same thing.
Even if two companies look similar on the surface, they may be operating under very different conditions, solving different problems, or responding to different constraints.
The real question is:
👉 Are we doing the right thing?
You might also be seeing something else — both competitors moving away could leave more room in the space you’re in.
If you want to calibrate, comparison can help — but only when what you are comparing to actually matches your situation.
Because this is where the confusion usually shows up:
So it becomes:
If this feels familiar, start here:
👉 Run the Second Look Decision Diagnostic to see what’s missing before you decide
👉See why this happens
👉 📖 Read more on Second Look blog
You can continue with making the decision afterwwards.