Can AI replace gut feel in planning?
It can’t replace judgment - but it can replace blind guessing.
Companies often start planning by opening last year’s budget and assuming the road hasn’t changed. Gut feel fills the gaps. AI helps replace gut feel and blind guessing with signals, patterns, and what actually shifted.
Planning without clarity is like heading out with a map you can’t read - or worse, no map at all. AI gives you a clearer map and the glasses to read it.
💡Many companies start planning on instinct - AI replaces instinct with real information.
Planning doesn’t fall apart because spreadsheets are complicated.
It falls apart because teams often skip the clarity stage and jump straight into numbers.
Typical weak spots:
starting from last year’s plan instead of what changed
depending on selective memory
unclear expectations about revenue or costs
no shared picture of capacity
outdated assumptions about customers
not understanding what changed in the market or behaviour
AI brings clarity before the numbers move.
These questions shape the early part of planning.
AI helps answer them quickly:
summaries of customer conversations
themes from CRM notes
patterns in service tickets
shifts in buying language
early signals in your sector
risks hidden in last year’s plan
Teams often skip this stage. AI makes it easy to surface.
Assumptions matter, but the whole picture matters more.
AI strengthens the full route:
new signals from customers and the market
a clearer view of what changed
inconsistencies between goals, capacity, and timing
early warnings about where the plan might fail
sharper priorities before time or money is allocated
AI improves the whole journey. It updates the map, cleans the glasses, and shows the path before you take the first step.
1. Gather your inputs
Customer emails, CRM notes, performance reviews, last year’s plan, pipeline.
2. Summarise the raw information
Ask AI to extract trends, patterns, pain points, and changes.
3. Ask the core question
“What changed?”
Then add:
What changed since last quarter? What changed since last year?
💬 Planning works best when it starts with what changed - not what you hope will happen.
4. List assumptions clearly
Revenue drivers, cost pressures, capacity limits, customer behaviour shifts, timing risks.
5. Test those assumptions
Ask AI:
What breaks if this is wrong?
Which month becomes tight?
Which project becomes unrealistic?
6. Check for contradictions
AI can spot when goals, capacity, and budgets don’t line up.
7. Finalise assumptions
Then open the spreadsheet.
8. Test the plan once it’s drafted
Ask AI where the plan contradicts itself and which assumptions carry the most risk.
Use the same pattern each time:
1. Customer signals
Summaries of complaints, requests, delays, objections.
2. Market signals
Changes in pricing, competitor moves, launches, messaging shifts.
3. Internal signals
Project delays, service issues, resourcing gaps.
4. Risk signals
Ask AI which patterns could cause demand drops, slow cash, or capacity strain.
5. Direction signals
Ask: “Which of these changes matter most for the year ahead?”
For newer planning techniques that fit into this approach, see New Approaches to Planning (upcoming).
Examples:
revenue drops 10%
costs rise 5%
hiring is delayed
supplier lead times increase
demand spikes early
A scenario is simply a structured version of a question that matters.
Typical gain: clarity in under an hour
Impact: sharper priorities, fewer surprises, better direction
☑ Summarise 5-10 customer trends
☑ Extract patterns and pain points
☑ Ask “What changed?”
☑ List assumptions clearly
☑ Test 2-3 critical assumptions
☑ Ask “What breaks if this is wrong?”
☑ Rewrite unclear assumptions
☑ Spot inconsistencies in your draft plan
☑ Identify risky assumptions
☑ Review the plan’s sensitivity after assumptions are set
☑ Check whether priorities align with what changed
✏️Clarity removes friction long before planning begins.
| 💡 Purpose | 🧩 Tool | 🔗 Link | 💬 What it does |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pipeline signals | Apollo / CRM | https://www.apollo.io | Finds deal patterns and objections |
| Document summary | Copilot or Gemini | n/a | Summaries of long notes, support tickets, reports |
| Assumptions and scenarios | ChatGPT | https://chat.openai.com | Challenges assumptions and tests simple scenarios |
📊The tools matter less than the clarity they produce.
🟦 Level 1 - If you only do one thing
Ask AI:
“Given last year’s plan and this year’s feedback, what changed - and what risks follow?”
🟧 Level 2 - If you want one more step
Run cautious and optimistic scenarios.
⭐ Full Approach - If you want the complete process
Gather inputs
Summarise key changes
Ask “What changed?”
List assumptions
Test them
Check contradictions
Finalise assumptions
Build the plan
Test the plan
Approach to Budgeting for Small Businesses (clarity before numbers): https://www.advancementquest.com/blog/approach-to-budgeting
Budget as a Story (how choices shape the year): https://www.advancementquest.com/blog/budget-as-a-story
Build a Budget You Can Steer By (upcoming)
Templates That Make SME Planning Easier (upcoming)
It shows where to focus and which assumptions are most likely to break your plan. https://www.businesshealthcheck.co.uk