Market value reflected it.
Nokia was worth roughly ~$130–150B and was one of the most valuable companies in Europe.
Apple was worth roughly ~$70–80B.
Then the market shifted to touchscreens, software-first devices, and app ecosystems.
Both saw it coming.
Nokia didn’t ignore the shift. It worked across multiple directions at once, keeping options open while trying to refine the right path.
Progress continued across all paths — more work, more refinement, more iteration - without locking into one direction early.
Apple moved differently. It chose a direction and launched.
The first iPhone had visible limitations:
It was clearly below the level of completeness Nokia was working towards in its systems and devices.
The decision was made anyway.
By 2013, Nokia had sold its mobile division to Microsoft after a failed turnaround, as loss of position made continuation unviable.
Apple went on to become the most valuable company in the world, reaching ~$2T+ market value.
There was no difference in awareness, capability, talent, resources, or exposure to the market shift.
But when and how the decision was made was dramatically different.
If this feels familiar, start here:
👉 Run the Second Look Decision Diagnostic to see what’s missing before you decide
👉See why this happens
👉 📖 Read more on Second Look blog
You can continue with making the decision afterwwards.